The Inevitable Downside of Faire

Lela Barker

As part of my ongoing blog series about emerging wholesale marketplaces, I’ve been exploring the potential of Faire (formerly Indigo Fair). While there’s certainly a lot to love about working with this wholesale platform for artisans, we don’t often hear much about the disadvantages. I set aside for now my hobby of playing 666casino games, to give you the best information I could have about the inevitable downside of faire. I’ve spent weeks studying this wholesale platform and speaking to retailers and brand owners who have a stake in the marketplace. I’m eager to share what I’ve learned about the disadvantages of Faire so that you can make an informed decision for your business.

Faire executives have agreed to address my concerns, and I look forward to sharing their response in an upcoming blog.


A significant downside of Faire wholesale is their fee structure, which has evolved over time. The rate for new makers onboarding in early 2019 is 25% on the first order from any buyer.  It then becomes 15% on subsequent orders from the same buyer. Faire frequently extends net 60 terms to shopkeepers, and makers can elect to pay an additional 3% fee for immediate payment. You can also choose to wait thirty days for payment and skip the 3% fee.


That translates to a substantial commission of up to 28% on Faire orders. As a consultant who’s had the privilege of coaching hundreds of brands through the mechanics of product pricing, those margins make me cringe. Let’s explore how that breaks down for a product that retails for $30.


Assuming a traditional keystone markup of 100%, a candle that sells for $30 online and in stores will wholesale for $15. I would advise the maker to limit the cost of creation (inclusive of raw materials, packaging, labor, and overhead) to between $5 and $6 so that their $15 wholesale target is 2.5-3x their cost.

When the candle sells for $15, Faire collects a $3.75 (25%) commission, assuming it’s the first time this buyer has purchased the brand. If the maker opts for immediate payment upon shipment, Faire will collect another 3% for a total of $4.20 of each unit sold.


That’s a handsome piece of the pie for Faire and a frighteningly slim margin for the artisan. To be clear: We should all expect to pay marketing expenses. Sales reps typically charge a 15% commission, in addition to the cost of samples and possible showroom fees. A single trade show appearance can easily tally $10,000.

While savvy brand owners bake marketing expenses into their products, they don’t often bake in 28%. And as someone that’s had the opportunity to peek inside the financials of hundreds of maker businesses (jewelers, ceramists, stationers, chandlers, apothecary brands, apparel brands, etc.), I’m keenly aware that a 28% commission isn’t sustainable for the vast majority of Lucky Break clients.


It’s also worth noting that Faire prohibits inflated wholesale pricing structures on the platform. While you’re allowed to sell at less that keystone (50% of your own retail), those products will be flagged for buyers. In all instances, your wholesale prices on Faire must match your wholesale prices elsewhere.

Faire’s policies make clear that their “Maker Success Team” regular performs pricing and content audits. “We review for wholesale and retail price consistency between your sites and when such discrepancies are identified through our audits or communicated to us from retailers, we may reach out and require action be taken to realign price consistency. Non-response and/or continued discrepancies may ultimately result in the temporary or permanent suspension of your account.”


Makers who joined the platform early enjoy a lower commission structure on Faire, often as low as 15%. Commission structures have been a bit all over the place, evolving as Faire fine-tunes its models and scales in proportion to the venture capital pouring into their effort. I have no information from Faire about whether they’ll be honoring the original commission structures indefinitely. However, they’re certainly honoring them at the moment.



Another downside of Faire is that buyers are continually encouraged to “brand hop,” which results in higher commissions for Faire and less loyalty to brand owners. The first time a retailer buys from a specific brand, they enjoy net 60 terms, free shipping, and free returns on unsold merchandise. The majority of those benefits evaporate on second and subsequent orders from the same brand.


While perpetually being fed new brands and compelling order incentives is a buyer’s dream, it’s problematic for brand owners. When the majority of orders delivered to Faire brands are from first-time buyers, brands are operating in the 25-28% commission zone more frequently than the 15-18% commission range. That’s painfully expensive.

The fact that brand profiles on Faire automatically suggest a curated selection of competitive brands doesn’t exactly inspire loyalty among shopkeepers. While discovering your brand, the marketplace feeds shopkeepers other options for purchase from within the same product category. Inserting those “other brands” into the conversation when a buyer returns to your Faire page to place a reorder doesn’t bode well for the original brand of interest.


At its core, Faire is a connector- a matchmaking service between brands and buyers that facilitates discovery. Naturally, it’s in the best interest of Faire to continue managing that relationship to reap the benefit of a commission. The nature of the relationship between retailers, brand owners, and Faire has some interesting implications.

According to the Faire guidelines, brand owners must keep first (and subsequent) transactions on the platform. Additionally, brands may not contact shops directly. They’re directed to utilize Faire’s messenger system to facilitate communication with retailers. That system enables conversations with buyers without revealing their contact information.


Interestingly, some brand owners can actually see the email addresses associated with their orders. I recently spoke with Julia Gold of Whispering Willow, an early adopter of the Faire platform and a moderator for the unofficial Facebook group for Faire makers. “We have full access to buyer’s email addresses and phone numbers. Some people seem to have access to this information while others do not. There are other programs (for example, the ability to invoice buyers directly) that others have access to and we do not. Some of these programs are in beta and have only released to small groups.”

Because Faire is ever-evolving, I’m not sure whether the display of buyer contact information is a beta program or if Faire previously displayed the contacts and then phased out that feature over time.



Regardless, it’s clear that Faire sits in the power position. They establish the parameters around the flow of communication and maintain the power to influence decision making. Faire controls which brands can play in their sandbox, which brands display for any given retailer, and how those brands transact. In a nutshell: Faire owns the buyers, not the brand.


None of that is surprising, but it’s an essential piece of the puzzle that I’ve noticed is often overlooked. Thanks to the simplified onboarding process and the sizable audience that they’ve accumulated in a short period, Faire has quickly become an easy avenue for additional revenue among the maker community.

But I’m always a bit hesitant about becoming dependent on any one platform. I coach the small businesses that I work with to be aware of their vulnerabilities and build plan B’s whenever possible. What I’ve found is that consolidations of power are rarely beneficial in the long term, and short-term gains often come back to bite. I’ve borne witness to these sorts of symbiotic relationships thanks to artisan’s dependence on Etsy, Etsy Wholesale, and Amazon. Most of my clients who have put the majority of their eggs in those baskets have been disappointed by either the results, the imbalance of power, or both.

A key component of Faire’s pitch to investors was their aim to become the Amazon of wholesale, and that brings the inevitable comparison. What will Faire’s next steps look like now that they have $116 million of venture capital behind them? What other services and features might they launch? How will they further monetize the power they’re rapidly accumulating? What will product designers do once they’re dependent on the platform and Faire ups the ante?


Full disclosure: I’m married to a whip-smart engineer who has spent decades immersed in the tech world as a product architect. We regularly chat about the societal impacts of technology over Sunday brunches. His career, wisdom, and perspective sometimes give me pause about the direction society is pursuing. Not the kind of pause that calls for accumulating stockpiles of canned beans or the installation of survival shelters. But the sort of pause that means I’m not voluntarily putting my DNA on file with 23 & Me or installing listening devices around my house (a la the Amazon Echo). So while my inherent skepticism isn’t anywhere near “911 was an inside job” levels, I’ll cop to a certain degree of pessimism and caution. And Faire raises red flags on several fronts.


Max Rhodes, Faire’s co-founder and CEO, has made no secret of his plans to expand their reach and rack up profits. I question the broader implications of reinventing the world of wholesale, courtesy of a single company that’s well-funded and decidedly ambitious. Even at the current scale, Faire tilts heavily in favor of buyers over brand owners. And I wonder how additional opportunities to monetize the platform will affect the artisan community. It’s important to ensure that we’re not crawling into bed with a hot new paramour who later turns out to be perpetually self-interested and motivated by different ideals. It’s of no long term benefit to be drawn deep into a relationship that eventually results in our co-dependence.

At the end of the day, Faire enjoys access to a startling amount of data about shopkeepers and brand owners. What products a store stocks, which products sell and at what rate (thanks to integrations with the shop’s POS system), what products from any one brand are returned and at what rate, how often a brand converts with shopkeepers, a brand’s pricing and policies, the density of any one brand in a given area, even which brands a shop previews on their platform. The nature of tech companies is that they trade in data, and I question what protections are in place for that data (the Faire privacy policy is decidedly vague). I wonder if the data gathering is even more valuable than the commissions collecting. And since Faire’s founding team originally met during their time at another tech company (Square), surely they realize the potential monetization and application of all that data.

I have additional reservations about working with Faire (specifically around their return policy, data collection, and the potential for brand dilution) and I highlight those in the next blog in this series. I invite you to read my additional thoughts about the pros and cons of Faire.


This blog is the fourth in a series about Indigo Fair/ Faire. As this series continues, I’ll explore:
• What is Faire?
• How to sell on Faire.
• What Makers & Buyers Love About Faire.
• An interview with Faire executives. They’ll share some of their future plans while addressing a few of my concerns about the platform.
• How makers in the Lucky Break community feels about their experiences with Faire, plus the hard data about how much and how often they’re selling.

What are your concerns about Faire? I’d love to hear your experience with the platform. Please drop a comment below!

About the Author

Lela Barker

Lela Barker hails from the deep-and-dirty south (ATL, represent!), where she spends her days helping makers and product designers navigate the pitfalls of product pricing, brand development, and wholesale strategy. She launched her apothecary brand in 2003 and bootstrapped the hell out of that little business to cultivate a portfolio of 1500+ stockists worldwide, generating $12million in revenue and establishing successful distributorships in the Middle East, EU, Scandinavia, and South Korea. Lela is the keeper of a well-worn passport and the maker of the finest lemon meringue pie you’ve ever put in your mouth.

11 responses on “The Inevitable Downside of Faire

  1. SL Meyer

    1: Here’s a BIG LEGAL RED FLAG: If Faire doesn’t allow a brand to see/have access to a retail buyers tax ID number, Faire is violating several States laws regarding wholesale/retail sales. Even more so if the buyer is located in the same state as the brand. My state requires this info. It’s not negotiable. And if the brand has an audit from their state, guess who bends over and gets the $hit end of that stick? Even worse, if there’s an audit from the IRS, the brand once again, will get the $hit end of that stick. Who in their right mind wants to have to worry about that? Or jump through who knows how many hoops or even have to get their lawyer involved to get this very basic info.

    2: If Faire doesn’t have or maintain a set “Buy Back” option (and terms that don’t change every. other. week), brands should expect to one day roll into their local discount/dollar/off market store and see their products there. If this isn’t specifically set out and adhered to, Faire can have the right to dispose of product/merchandise in their possession in any manner that they see fit. My lawyer told me from day one of me going into wholesale to add a buyback clause to cover many potential adverse events that could happen to a retailer, up to and including Force Majeure. Some might think that’s overkill, but hey, guess what happens when -not if- that happens? More bending over.

    Both of these are something all brands should think about.

  2. Lela

    I received an email this morning and wanted to include Belinda’s thoughts in this discussion….

    “Hi Lela

    I am trying to comment on your blog to one of the blog posts on the Faire series, but unable to – I get an error message. Here is what I am trying to write.

    Thank you for putting together these great blog posts on Faire. We have been approached by Faire and have an onboarding call with them tomorrow. I have 2 concerns. The first has already been addressed (and commented about) and is in regard to not knowing who the Faire customer is. If we get labels, surely we would have an address? Also, the issue of Tax ID has been raised – I look forward to your further comments on this.

    Here is my second concern – our product is a rain poncho. It seems to be the only (and probably first) apparel item that is on the Faire site and I do not think Faire have had any prior experience with dealing with apparel – which is its own beast. Our ponchos fold up into a small packet (we call it a pouch). When the ponchos exit the factory they are neatly folded into this “pouch” – and I mean very neatly. While it is certainly possible to refold the poncho back, we always hold any returns aside for marketing use as they are not deemed neat enough for resale. So if a store has a return policy for its customers, and the customer decided to return the poncho – what is stopping the retailer to return this within the 60 days glory period? Regardless, I do not think we will get any returns of the poncho in the same state that they were sent out. This is my red flag.

    Do we know how many of the retailers using Faire are brick and mortar and how many are online? My product is better suited to online. It would be nice to specify online only. This platform already seems to be favoring the retailer over the manufacturer.

    Kind regards

    1. pat

      hi there
      as Belinda noted we are shipping to customers therefore we know who’s buying , no?
      also as far as sales tax, exemptions, audits etc etc it appears Faire is the one paying . no? then the 1099 or what ever tax form is required will come from them
      not a wholesaler yet with Faire. but do have a call tomorrow . turned away from them in the past because of fees. however in the food industry most distributors get 30-35% plus guarantees and buy backs. we always get it in the $hit and of the the stick from them. lots of dishonesty because they feel their margins is too small at 30-35%. funny wish we had those margins without all the OH to get there

  3. Martha

    Faire has a ton of fraud going on. They will charge cards without authorization, change the name of the meRchant account and more. They are being looked at by the SEC and there have already been arrests. BUYERS BEWARE! I lost over$4,000!b This is. Not a company you want to do business with, in fact, companies are leaving faire in droves.

    1. J. Rachel

      Hi Martha. I tried to do an online search of this and find information, but I can not. Do you have any articles to back this up? I would like to learn more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *